___ ______ ___ _________ _________ ___ \__\ \ __\ \ \__ \______ \ \ _____\ \__\ ___ \ \ \ __\ _____\ \ \ \ ___ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ____ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \_____ \ \____ \ \__\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \__\ \_______\ \______\ \________\ \__\ \__\ * m a g a z i n e * -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= A T A R I F A L C O N R E V I E W -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Well, Atari's new wonder machine has finally arrived, in small quantities at least. The first piece of bad news is that due to our current dismal standing in the exchange rates, prices have risen. The 4/65 model (which I 've got) now retails for around 900-1000 pounds, and I expect a similar rise in the price of the other configurations.. But it's worth it folks, honest... 1) Hardware The falcon arrives looking identical to an STE apart from the new colour keys. There is a small circular grill on the underside which houses a cooling fan. Unfortunately, this is not thermostatically controlled and is somewhat noisy in a small room. However, when you're using it it's not too intrusive. The ports out the back are well documented (it's about the only technical detail that was known way ahead) but the RF output is a phono socket, so you need to hack up a cable yourself to plug it into a TV, which is how I'm using mine until my VGA monitor arrives. Sound input and output are standard stereo minijacks. The mouse/joystick ports are still in the old stupid place too. The hard disk supplied in my machine is a Conner 65Mb model, and seems quite fast. However, it was partitioned in a rather perculiar fashion and I had to redo it, which was no trouble. Standard atari hard diskdrivers are used. NO video adapters are supplied. Apparently they retail at about a tenner each. One for ST,VGA and composite output. The Video socket is a 19 pin DB socket, which I can't find a plug for ANYWHERE. Neither Maplin nor RS stock them, so if you are thinking of building some custom video adapter, you'll have to get in touch with atari. 2) Software First the bad news. Atari UK are not yet shipping Multi_Tos. However, I'm told that it will be sent free of charge to all falcon owners. Also missing are the system sound manager and the audio fun machine. I don't know about them. The programs which ARE shipped are :- a) Calappt. A sheduler/Appointment book/phone book. This is quite a neat little package, icon-driven in the main and quite easy to follow. b) Landmines If you've seen minesweeper on the PC you know what to expect. Only this version has sampled sound effects (including a great BOOM) and the buttons are given a nice gradual colour change.. c) Breakout The old favourite. Samples are quite good and it plays quite well, but it is only breakout after all, so it hasn't been used much. d) TClock A clock program which actually TELLS you the time, no less. In a clear female american voice. However, since I'm not multi-tasking and I don't wanna pay 900 quid for an alarm clock, I haven't used it much.. All these programs look to have been written to use MTos, as they all sit in windows and are mouse controlled. 3) In use O.K., so much for the adverts. What's it actually LIKE?? Right. I use it mostly at 640*400*8 bit on a TV. THis resolution flickers somewhat, but is usable for say an hour at a time if you have reasonable breaks. The flicker is noticeable mainly in the gadgets of windows and other high- contrast boundaries. If you display a 256-colour graphic such as a ray- traced picture, that doesn't flicker at all. It feels SUBJECTIVELY about as fast as my mono STFM, which is not bad considering it's pushing 8 times as much data around the screen. Actual processing seems to be about 5 times faster, which is borne out by Quick index, which rates the CPU section at about 450-500% of a standard ST. It rates video performance much lower, but since it won't run in ST mono res (but will in 640*400*256.. Go figure) I can't make a real comparison of video speed. The true-colour modes slow the video down even more. At 320*200 it runs at about ST low speed, but at 640*400*true it drags horribly. Gemview2.13 took 2 seconds to re-draw a window after I'd moved it. I think the Hi-res truecolour mode is destined to be a display rather than a use mode, if you follow. 320*200 truecolour games seem quite feasible though. The new desktop (Tos 4.01 apparently) is VERY nice. All the icons are now full colour (16) and, rather than just inverting when selected, animate, A drawer will open, a disk light will come on or the wastebin's lid will open. I'm waiting desparatley for an editor for these.. You can assign keyboard short-cuts to any menu option. The menu system is identical to Tos 2.whatever. The windows and icons have been spruced up and (unless you change them with the cpx) are metallic in look, much like Windows 3.1. The whole desktop reminds me quite heavily of Macintosh system 7, which I guess is a compliment :-). The sound system is possibly the most impressive part. The claim of CD quality sampling is by no stretch unfeasible. I recorded some material off a CD and to my ears, there was no difference when piped through a proper stereo. Unfortunatly, the built-in speaker is somewhat tinny, so I would advise people interested in good sound quality either to link it into a stereo system or buy a GOOD set of active walkman speakers to plug in. The input socket is a microphone rather than a line-in, which caused the first input I tried to be somewhat distorted. However, using a lead from a CD walkman to the socket produced a fine reproduction quality. The system doesn't automatically pass on any audio signal fed into it, so you have to have sound software running to hear the input. Using the PD Winrec program I was able to produce high-quality samples, and playing a .MOD file using Falcplay was a revelation. The idea of computers 'beeping' is gone forever... 4) Compatability Next I'll mention my efforts running ST software. Considering that very little of the machines is actually common, I was quite inpressed. Most Gem programs will run, although it is best to run in an ST compatability mode (they have a special option in the 'set video..' menu item) as some can corrupt the screen. Those which fail to run usually give two bombs, which if memory serves is a bus error. This would likely they are trying to access something which isn't there anymore... There are two big exceptions. Neither version of Timeworks runs. As soon as you try to access the menu, the entire computer stalls dead. This is unusual, as the Falcon is much more able to recover than an ST. When a program crashes, it now prints an alert box to tell you so, with aoptions to continue or re-boot. The other exception is (get this) GDOS. That's right. Atari, who complained at everybody else when things broke on the STE, can't write them properly themselves. GDOS 1.1 locks up the machine while booting, which is most inconveient. You have to hold down ESC,CTRL,ALT and BOTH shift keys to stop the HD booting (try it sometime. You need about four hands...) and re-install the disk so you can remove it. This also happens if an accessory crashes it. I haven't tried that many yet, but their failure rate seems quite low. Luckily, FONTGDOS (which you can get from some FTP sites or the ST club) works perfectly. Some applications I KNOW run are... Hyperpaint/Draw Degas Elite All the Hisoft products Calamus 1.09 Calamus SL Pagestream 2.2 Calligrapher Some of these require st resolutions though. The best guess is that if it is a fairly standard GEM program,it's about 80% likely to run. GAMES are a different matter. For one, any that autoboots and EXPECTS to be in ST LOW will fail, because you aren't. It boots up to 320*200*256 on a TV. So any game which you can't run from the desktop is out for that reason. I would guess also that most STOS games will fail, because they always seem to. Incidentally, a STOS 3D game from ST format's cover disk of a while ago works fine (talk about smooth 3d. Run it on an ST then double the speed. I just wish I understood what was going on.) but the palette is corrupted. Quite a few PD games run, some at normal speed and others with varying degrees of acceleration. My fave game at the moment is another ST format one, called DROID. Sort of a rip-off of The Killing Game show. On a falcon it makes Sonic the Hedghog look like a slug. I haven't got many commercial games, because I sold most of them with my ST. There is supposed to be a program called DcBootit (I think) which allows you to run an autoboot disk from the desktop. However, I can't find this program so I can't say. With games it is definitly suck it and see, I'm afraid. Also, the DEMO of Mig-29 runs perfectly and looks amazing. When people start writing flight simulators for this bird, we're gonna have a whale of a time. Falcon Falcon 3.0 anyone? 5) Conclusion The question we have to ask is, would I buy one again if this one was taken away. I have to say yes I would. And I work every day using Mac's and PC's. The falcon 4/65 with a VGA monitor retails at about the same price as a Mac LCIII (when they hit the streets. ATARI aren't the only ones who miss shipping dates..) which is a comparable machine. The difference between the two is a toss up. The new desktop (with Multi-Tos) is as good as system 7, and the quality of Atari software has caught up to that of the Mac recently. With Calamus SL or pagestream 2 you can produce just as good DTP as a mac, with Lexicor's modelling software you can do high-quality animation. The Atari also has superior sound, a better games market and the huge ace of a DSP chip. Whether to buy a falcon or a PC is possibly a harder choice. The equivalent price PC will be faster than the Falcon, and will probably have a bigger hard disk. There is also the huge range of PC software to consider. However, to upgrade a PC to something close to the general facilities the falcon has (sound,graphics etc..) would require further outlay, and you have the massive performance drag of Windows to consider. The reason you can buy a 486/25 for the same price is because you NEED a 486/25 to get similar GUI performance. Same for disk space. Calligrapher pro takes up about 3 megs of disk space max. Wordperfect for Windows or Word for Windows take up 10's of megabytes. They also cost a lot more. The bare economics is that, in the U.K. at least, in pure USABLE performance terms, the falcon is the equal of any other machine in a comparable price bracket. If you include the as yet unexploited power of the DSP and the high-power sound system, it's quite superior. If you have an ST and are thinking of upgrading for serious use, it's the way to go. For games you might be better buying a Super Nintendo or a Megadrive right now (or even waiting for the Atari Jaguar...). Some falcon games are coming, but it'll be a couple of years maybe before we actually see what it can do.. Would I buy one again? Yes. Like a shot. Would I give mine up for a PC or Mac? No, sorry. Can you borrow it? Not a chance.... If anyone wants to contact me with a question I can be contacted via JANET mail as PSYWHITE@UK.AC.BOLTON.BASIL. If you don't have Janet Facilities, You could write to NIk at the user group address, and he might be able to pass things on to me. Jonathan White